I was in the Intermediate Class in College. In the main subjects I was considered a good stude...
Expand
I was in the Intermediate Class in College. In the main subjects I was considered a good students, not a great one: essentially because I had other fish to fry: I was active in cricket, playing initially for the College B team and then captaining it: I was not good enough to be in the first eleven at Loyola, which had one test player and three Ranji Trophy players and I did not wish to be the perennial 12th man and so I chose to be in the second eleven. I also was in the NCC on the way to becoming a pilot. in the Air Wing. However, I was known to be excellent in Hindi as this was Madras and the first language I had learned in UP where I was born, was hindi. So it might have been a case to quote Desidarious Erasmus""In the country of the blind the one-eyed man is king". However, most of the English medium types took Hindi as the second language, as Tamil was too difficult and Sanskrit too esoteric.
This was the final examination, a University examination with two invigilators and the whole nine yards of supervision. I had completed my Hindi examination within the time allotted with about half an hour to spare. I was sitting there twiddling my thumbs, when my friend(since school) Govind, casually reached over and picked up my answer paper and busily started copying. I was in a quandry: Govind was a friend of ten years standing, and that at 17 is a major portion of your life. I decided I could not report him, as my friendship was more important to me than the ethics of the situation. For about half an hour while Govind was busy copying, I died several deaths. If Govind were caught. not only would he be failed or worse, but so would I as a party to the copying. If I was not caught during the examination I would surely be caught if they compared our two answer papers after the fact. In that case they would not be able to establish as to who was the copier and who the copied. However, Govind was not caught and I went on to win the Hindi Prize that year, a Prize that was given to me by the then Chief Minister and Congress leader Kamaraj Nadar.
This was an interesting dilemma that I faced fifty years ago: I handled it in a certain way. How would you have done it ???
Close
Ravi: Wrong and right as you say ar relative terms it depends largely, as they say on 'whose ox is gored' If either a second person is hurt by one's action or if society is compromised people will take notice. What I unwittingly did is something related to the latter point. But, knowing what the consequence would have been if I had reported, to my friend, I probably did the right thing, but still I felt guilty right through the summer holidays, particularly if someone had noticed some word for word similarity in our answer papers.
Reply | | Report Abuse
G Gopal,
I look at this philosophicallly.Wrong and right are all terms relative to times and situations.
I also like this sayiing " small things do not matter; nothing in this world is big enough to matter ".
Practically speaking what you did was right according to me.I would have done the same.
Ravi.
Reply | | Report Abuse
Thank you Bina: However, my friend knew if he had asked I would have said no, so he just grabbed it, figuring that I would stay mum: shich I did !
Rgds, Girdhar
Reply | | Report Abuse
GGji
interesting dilemma- had my paper copied partially n only recall the fast beating heart n
pulse due to fear of being caught. also in french a close friend simply wrote the song
"someone else is in your arms tonight" by cliff richard and passed!!! guess the teacher
who corrected our papers was sick of all mistakes n enjoyed this diversion from
mutilated n strangled french
bina
ps at that age there are no choices but to stick to yr friend
Reply | | Report Abuse
Keshav: Thank you for your input. I think I will draw the line on what I consider a serious crime, anything that seriously affects other people.
Rgds, Girdhar
Reply | | Report Abuse
Interesting dilemma :-)
Since you ask, I would have done exactly the same as you did. Kept mum.
Let me tell you why.
He took the paper without asking, you did'nt give it of your own volition. So the crime (stealing) was committed by him.
At the most, your crime was one of omission as you did not report the crime. This is at best a moral offense. It was the duty of he invigilators to prevent / detect the actual crime.
Your job at the time was to appear for the examination, which you did to the best of your ability.
cheers,
Keshav
Reply | | Report Abuse
Aditi: Thank you for your comments. On balance, I think, I will do it again, given the same circumstances, but tell the person he is no longer my friend as he compromised me without my permission. However, for a more serious crime where other people are affected I think friendships will have to be sacrificed. There was a person called the unibomber in the US whose brother finally exposed him. The unibomber was responsible for killing people and the brother decided there was a limit to personal relationships.
Rgds, Girdhar
Reply | | Report Abuse
Hi Mr Girdhar Gopal,
My answer. Perhaps exactly as you had handled it. Loyalty and solidarity in friendship comes first. I have taken punishments in school for not reporting on a mischief-maker. Once in the junior school, the teacher had written on my paper 'copied from S', when it was S who had copied from me, but I kept quiet, though as you can see, so many decades down the line, hahah... I still have not forgotten the incident.
Regards,
Aditi
Reply | | Report Abuse
Tanushri: The intention to save was only after he grabbed my answer book. I did not report him that was the extent of my saving..
Rgds, Girdhar
Reply | | Report Abuse
Hi Girdhar,
You saved your friend and I guess that was a choice you made...may be I'd have done the same, in a similar situation....
Reply | | Report Abuse
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
Displaying 1 - 10 of 37 Blog Comments